|
Post by CataclysmicDeath on Apr 7, 2012 12:56:04 GMT
What ever Cata, you wanna troll one best tank players on the server, go ahead. You should try adding something constructive about Strongheart instead of insulting my playing abilty. You want me to not be defensive? Dont compare my tanks to the rest . They are not equal. Oh come now Shak, u really expect anyone to actually comment constructively on this comment? And actually take it seriously? Do remember that after you manage to shrink you rather over inflated ego down to a more natural size that I have seen you play your tanks...... Seriously girl you aint all that. This server is populated by people who are just as good tank players as you and some much better. Jeez and I thought I had an ego. As for the Strongheart, any comment I make is going to be hit with antagonism form you since it will be contrary to your opinion as you have already shown, so is there any real point in my making a comment? Constructive or otherwise? It's simple, I have tanks with ac both above and below 125, not a one of them suffers for a lack of the Strongheart Ammy. Your comment that it is necessary, well while that may certainly be true for your amazingly super, uberley awesome leet, omg help it's Shakua's tank we are all doomed, character to survive, that just doesn't ring true for the other half of the server than can fit online around your rather overly large head space. This is something that is even more obvious when you read the responses you got from Kusin, who has some great tanks and doesn't even own a Strongheart and STILL does great (OMG HOW!?!?!?!?!?!? He has NO Strongheart!!! Damn his toons SUCK ) And Crazy who actually thinks it is fine as is though his bard wearing it comes from making a tough choice between immunities and extra ac. So far I've only seen you agreeing with you and that is a bit of a silly argument to use. "I'm uber, you suck and I agree with myself so I'm right" Wow you told me!! Congrats Cata
|
|
|
Post by CataclysmicDeath on Apr 7, 2012 13:00:50 GMT
AS for me being a Troll? Wel perhaps you should read up on what a troll actuall is. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_(Internet)According to my sources pointing out to some one they are being stupidly egotistical and need to take a chill because some one has a different opinion isn't a Troll. Asshat.......(<==And yes that is a trollish comment ) Cata
|
|
|
Post by Torin on Apr 7, 2012 14:12:00 GMT
You didn't followed the "count to 10, breath slowly" rule. And now sell your Strongheart to me since you never need it
|
|
|
Post by desocupado on Apr 7, 2012 14:22:14 GMT
IIRC The Tiamat Tooth actually has no requirements beyond level 40 to use except maybe under HC rules so it has a solid value point that is often overlooked. strongheart has no tag requirement either, sure the tiamat tooth doesnt have a str requirement, but both can be used at 40. i do think the tiamat tooth could have the element immunities bumped up to 10% (leave div at 5%) and AC to 17 it would probally get more use. id like to see other variants of strongheart tbh... 28 base dex 28 base wis 28 base con 28 base cha 28 base int but drop in sperate layers. Well, the Amulet of Unbroken Balance is the closest thing of a Dex version of strongheart.
|
|
|
Post by CataclysmicDeath on Apr 7, 2012 14:23:21 GMT
I think there might already be a kind of Wisdom variant too?
Could be wrong though
|
|
|
Post by shomi on Apr 7, 2012 15:28:38 GMT
I heard your ely wiped yesterday. Maybe if your tanks were as good as you claim you would have been able to drag your party to victory, as shak frequently does.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2012 15:38:00 GMT
Yes, people like stronghearts, and enough styles of tanking require them to justify an increased strongheart droprate. In my opinion.
....lmao
|
|
|
Post by CataclysmicDeath on Apr 7, 2012 15:44:18 GMT
Well considering I was playing Bard on that Ely I'd have been amazed if my tanks could drag anything to victory on that particular run Mish.
Perhaps you should make sure you have all the facts before making yourself look like an idiot and acting like an asshat.
As for Shak dragging groups to victory, I'd like to see it, she's obviously been slacking off quite considerably when she's been in parties with me, I've never seen her do that.
But thanks for rubbing it in our face that we wiped, classy of you. I'm quite sure everyone who was on that run is very grateful to you.
Cata
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2012 15:52:53 GMT
Shiny AND happy, please. I've been the conductor on many a fail train in my day, but for as not-shiny as my image may be I am HAPPY. Yet here are three of the major, nay, Epic, players here failing miserably in doing anything other than making the mod look like a festering toilet of bloated egos, hostility, and over-sensitivity. New players can read the thread and think, "Oh look, I can aspire to be like one of these long term serious players and become just as petty and hostile as them". Now join together and flame-broil this obvious trolling of what has become a worthless thread, or sthu for the sake of your own reputations as perhaps not-so-petty key players on HG. Shiny happy people holding hands dammit!
|
|
|
Post by CataclysmicDeath on Apr 7, 2012 15:58:29 GMT
Now I just wanna vomit.......
Thanks Over.
Key player? No I aint.
However, enough of the off topic crap, I'm gunna leave the discussion alone, I shoulda known better than to try to comment on one of Mish's threads, every time I do it ends up being a waste of time.
I'll go watch some paint dry, much more entertaining.
Cata
|
|
|
Post by kusin111 on Apr 7, 2012 16:00:10 GMT
I did ely last week with my bard as the only tank without SH. It did not make a difference. It as successful and I don't even think that we had 10 in the party.
|
|
|
Post by shomi on Apr 7, 2012 16:14:37 GMT
I shoulda known better than to try to comment on one of Mish's threads, every time I do it ends up being a waste of time. Mission accomplished.
|
|
|
Post by Shakua on Apr 7, 2012 16:55:39 GMT
you guys really dont seem get the point which builds would require high{er} ac. bard is not one of them due to special defenses.
|
|
|
Post by kite on Apr 7, 2012 18:20:40 GMT
I really don't think insulting cata's tanks is making a good case, anymore than self-proclamation of tanking greatness. I'd wager that he at least has more fun with his builds and in my mind having fun would be the main point of a game! The amulet is a good choice for a str build, it's by no means a necessity.
|
|
|
Post by kusin111 on Apr 7, 2012 18:24:12 GMT
And str staff monks don't have any "special defense"? thought they had crit immune and conceal. It's been a while since I played one though, so I could be wrong.
|
|