BUR Sub-Races a bit too rare? Jun 21, 2013 19:48:53 GMT
Post by FunkySwerve on Jun 21, 2013 19:48:53 GMT
I didn't say you were. I said you were being 'cute' with me, which is the closest adjective I could find to describe your post, which was both flippant and lacking in necessary detail.
Please read again my comments more closely and employ the same consideration with which I read yours. To be honest, I feel you have just bombarded me with straw-man questions.
I asked the questions in need of answering. They aren't 'straw men', in any sense of the word. They're what I need to know to evaluate your opinion, which I did take seriously. In point of fact, we ARE likely to increase droprates (slowly, until we find a good spot), but I need a sense of where players feel those rates are at now, and where they feel they should be.
Please do not dismiss my arguments as "your cause."
I wasn't being dismissive. You are advocating for increased BUR droprates. That's your cause, for the moment at least. It's not even derogatory. Your opinion is in no danger of being dismissed, so long as you actually answer the questions I put to you.
I ask again, is there some mechanism by which we can objective gauge the BUR book drop rate in terms of both frequency and location?
Sure. Count the number of BUR books you see drop on runs. If you want to get fancy, figure out the droprate per hour of play. What interests me more, however, is player perceptions. Sure, they're faulty and often wildly inaccurate when it comes to the workings of the game, but at the end of the day they're what matters.