|
Post by FunkySwerve on Apr 24, 2013 7:02:13 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Paradoom on Apr 24, 2013 10:36:45 GMT
Very interesting find funky. Funny and shocking at the same time. This proofs once more: don't believe in any statistical table, unless you manipulated it's results yourself!
|
|
|
Post by chirality on Apr 24, 2013 15:07:33 GMT
Awesome. Thanks for sharing.
Also loving reading "Next New Deal" posts as well (two or three times since I don't really understand most of it).
"A standard way of doing this is using a "distributed lag" model - which just means regressing GDP growth on a set of leads and lags in debt to GDP ratio, and then forming an "impulse response" from, say, a hypothetical 10 point increase in the debt-to-GDP ratio (where 100 is when the debt level is equal to GDP). Figure 3 below reports these impulse responses. What we find is exactly the pattern consistent with reverse causality.
. . .
Controlling for the previous year's GDP growth largely erases the negative relationship between debt-to-GDP ratio and GDP growth, especially for the range where debt is 30 percent or more of GDP. This is because a fall in GDP precedes the rise in Debt-to-GDP ratio. This is yet another demonstration that the simple bivariate negative correlation is driven in substantial part by reverse causality."
|
|
|
Post by gandoron on Apr 24, 2013 16:34:10 GMT
I remember seeing this a few weeks back. The weighting is almost laughably bad. Pretty disturbing that this made it so far with effectively zero peer review.
-Graham
|
|
|
Post by FunkySwerve on Apr 24, 2013 19:15:06 GMT
Yup. I deliberately avoided the two, maybe three obligatory scathing rants about ideology over fact, peer review, and more. Funky
|
|