No GM wand after doing 1-3

[tega091]

Did GM 1-3 on 2/4/18 and did not get wand fragment account: tegaO91 character: Neggy SL Jooscilo

[Raj]

Check if you attuned to both previous portals.

[Deleted]

We did the fight as Prince of Demons. Correct me if I am wrong but the reward breakdown is the following:

1) You are participating as a helper. You have never killed the given boss as a Demon Lord or Prince. You receive a wand and the tag.

2) You are participating as a helper. You have previously killed the given boss as a Demon Lord or Prince. You do not receive the wand and have previously acquired the tag.

3) You are tagging for the given Prince. You have 4-5 wands as appropriate in your possession. You receive a vestige and all progress and attunement is reset.

4) You are not tagging for the given Prince. You have 4-5 wands as appropriate in your possession. You do not receive a vestige and all progress and attunement is reset.


Is the above all true?

[Raj]

1,2,3: Yes
4: No

In theory.

[Deleted]

RE: 4. Is four treated the same as two? If you have tagged for the given Prince already and show up to help fully wanded, nothing happens to them?

[drunkenboastor]

Wands are not consumed and vestige/mote not granted for defeating any Prince that you have defeated before.

[tega091]

So interesting enough it is showing on my skull I didn't attune but that has to clearly be a bug because after P1 we went outside for the "free" rest and we recharged rings after P2. I also remember using skull before reentering portal to get to P3 and said i was attuned to the second portal in GM. We did do prince fight but why would that remove all of my attunements(if i wasn't attuned i wouldn't have been able to get back into p3 also, no?) instead of giving me wand?

[Raj]

You can enter any Abyss portal even if you didn't attune to the previous ones, you simply do not get a tag. Player error, pretty common on tanks/bots/anchors.

[Deleted]

Feb 6, 2018 7:30:19 GMT Raj said:

tanks

[drunkenboastor]

You do not receive a wand from a prince fight if you already have the tag for defeating him as a prince of demons.

[Deleted]

Bump. Per Mushypoo this is all a lie? You tag and wand everytime, regardless of circumstances as long as you have the two portals prior? Someone please advise as this was just recently all declared inaccurate per Mushypoo.

[rainbowdash]

Doubt Rump would accuse anyone of lying tbh. What a DM needs to hand out wands tho is proof its not a player error (or that the run really happened what in this case prolli isnt an issue). So next time just take a screenshot that shows you in the bossroom with log open saying that you are attuned to that part of abyss 2.

Its pretty similar to the old pelormote issue .... i can't just run around saying I did X run but didnt get any reward pls fix.

[Deleted]

I am not claiming rump is accusing anyone of lying. My question is about tagging. Raj, Db, and myself in this thread all agree and have known the system for tagging to be, if you previously have done a boss as Prince of Demons, and do so again, you don’t wand. You tag P1 and P2, but no wand. If you haven’t done that boss as Prince before, you will wand.

Rump has said what we all think is the system, is not in fact the system. So i requested clarification on the parameters. Because Rumps claim would make what myself, Raj, and DB all think inaccurate and is news to me.

[chirality]

Maybe a good place to start would be specifying what was said and what exactly is conflicted. "This is all lies" / "the system is not the system" / "rumps claim" is leaving quite some room for guessing what happened or what triggered these posts.

Is it the case that rump told you that you in fact recieve tag+wand regardless of circumstance?

Or is it even the case that you actually spoke with him? What exactly was asked and what was the answer given? Perhaps there was some miscommunication or 2nd-hand information involved here?

At any rate, if you haven't yet, wouldn't the best way to satisfy your curiosity be to speak directly with rump (PM, ingame?) and clear up whatever confusion you have over the subject matter? Cuz this approach is a bit hyped-up to say the least...?

No offense meant, but looks a lil strange and (pardon me, but) fake-news-ish to suddenly necro this thread with some attention-grabbing headlines. Especially when this entire thread/"issue" was a nonstarter...?