|
Post by lala on Jan 30, 2007 21:38:37 GMT
I always thought Legendary Saves existed until I recently looked. As I couldnt find any, here are a couple of ideas that would work well: There would be 3 legendary saves, 1 for each type.
Idea 1 Requirements - None When selected the feat adds +6 to the specific save, however if the character has either (not both) of the pre-20 or epic relevant save feat this increases to +8.
Idea 2 Requirements - Either (but does not need both) of the relevant pre-20 or epic save. When selected the feat adds +8 to the relevant save.
Either provides a nice balance, the 1st idea because without the other save its only +6. The latter because it requires more feat selections, for most builds that means spending 6 feats to gain good saves. Increasing the requirement to both pre-20 and epic save would be too expensive as that means 9 feats used for an extra +8 (to cover the 3 save types).
Hope the team likes the idea. Lala
|
|
|
Post by dodrudon on Jan 30, 2007 22:02:49 GMT
That might be a little too powerful for classes with weak saves. I consider strong/weak saves a class feature, so monks' super-good saves is a bonus of the class, while a mage's weak saves are also a feature of that class.
|
|
|
Post by FunkySwerve on Jan 30, 2007 23:14:03 GMT
|
|
|
Post by lala on Jan 31, 2007 1:54:14 GMT
That might be a little too powerful for classes with weak saves. I consider strong/weak saves a class feature, so monks' super-good saves is a bonus of the class, while a mage's weak saves are also a feature of that class. Try the hells and your views will change ;D
|
|
|
Post by lala on Jan 31, 2007 2:05:56 GMT
Thx for the link as well Funky, not sure how I missed that and kinda funny how we both are thinking about it now As a discussion point, +6 does work better than the +8 I suggested, but it would be nice if it needed either the pre-20 or epic feat, not both. Thats still 6 feats for a of non-dex builds to cover the 3 types and thats nearly a whole set of incremental feats (which is 7). Thx Lala
|
|
|
Post by archmage on Jan 31, 2007 6:35:30 GMT
Mages? my mage has 79/77/82, thats not weak.
|
|
|
Post by dodrudon on Jan 31, 2007 6:42:42 GMT
I meant save progressions :/
If that's the case, I like the idea of limiting the save feats to level 54 and above (or something similar), otherwise it would (maybe) unbalance the easier runs.
|
|
|
Post by lala on Jan 31, 2007 13:17:15 GMT
Mages? my mage has 79/77/82, thats not weak. Sorc with splash Pali/BG by any chance? Taking epic save with natural stats around 24 you still cannot get much above 65 even if the base save is very strong (say 12-13) without Pali or BG.
|
|