|
Post by nicnik on Aug 23, 2007 23:21:31 GMT
Ok i'll keep this brief.
How about if sorceror's were allowed to change spells at altar at level 60? Would that be fair? would that be overpowered?
Personally I think it'll be great for sorcerors, whilst it's not harming neither would it makes wizards weak in comparison. Wizards already get to use all the spells (exclude inhibit school), +2 to school dc, and more importantly a tonne of skill points and free feats.
discuss.
|
|
|
Post by the1kobra on Aug 23, 2007 23:28:47 GMT
Considering the whole bunch of changes that have been happening recently, it might be fair to let some sorcs swap spells due to some of them getting nerfed/boosted in some way. I think the most prevalent was the wierd change. It went from being an utterly useless spell that no one would ever use into a real nice killing machine. And with the up coming changes, I think that many sorcs are going to feel left out because a wizard can change thier books but sorcs are stuck with spells that were great at the time but later on became useless, or better options were created. I mean, I don't know what I would give to be able to give my sorc Bih now... as when I 60ed him there were better 5s to get. There would have to be something stopping sorcs from changing spells every time they go to a different area. I think it might be fair to give 60th level sorcs a chance to redo thier spells every time there is a major update, but they should not be able to have every spell at once.
|
|
|
Post by cathedralmaster on Aug 23, 2007 23:57:12 GMT
|
|
|
Post by nicnik on Aug 24, 2007 1:03:31 GMT
Im not even gona click that link. why search? an issue before may not be an issue now. For all i know that thread could be ages ago.
I want people of todays hg to post their views and see wot they say. alot of things have changed and will be changed soon, and todays HG is a different mod than before.
so perhaps it's a more appropriate time to bring it up again
|
|
|
Post by FunkySwerve on Aug 24, 2007 1:28:01 GMT
Im not even gona click that link. why search? an issue before may not be an issue now. For all i know that thread could be ages ago. Because if you haven't bothered to inform yourself, the odds of you saying anything to provoke ANY sort of response from a team member are pretty slim. In large part, because I grew tired of repeating myself a long time ago. No offense, but I have better things to do than rehash issue xyz all over again for the umpteenth time. It's like watching reruns of reruns, just a notch above watching paint peel and grass grow. Put another way, if you can't even be bothered to put forth a little effort, then 1) it can't be that important to you and 2) why should I? Hell, you don't even have to actually implement anything if we DO like the idea. Funky
|
|